Theos-Talk Archives (October 2002 Message tt00031)

Bart wrote:
Theosophists and self-styled Theosophists, notably Alice Bailey, who was
raised as a Fundamentalist Christian and was a racist, Jew hater, and
considered all homosexuals to be inherently evil. Those who wish to put

Of course many teachings spread by AAB are in contradiction to HPB and her
teachers.
OTOH, I doubt she was a racist and a Jew hater. Not any one who loves the
truths and speaks out the truth if he/she finds it a duty to do so, is a
hater, even if the truth is not favorable for someone. The more, someone who
does it could with the same or more right considered to be a Jew lover from
a higher perspective. That accusation is an old Jewish trick to suppress any
criticism which comes from Jewish evil doing. Or do you say that never ever
a Jew or a Jewish group did any evil to others?
Do you consider the recent JINSA activities on the Bush administration as
good or as evil?
And is Jesus to be regarded as a Jew hater, when he said to the Jews that
they have the devil in them? And also Purucker who did say similar things?
If moral code and truth are no landmarks, then it would be better to
theosophists to declare publicly that hypocrisy, cant and lie are almost
welcome within their circles supposed the beast soul has its harmony and
peace.

Brian/Brigitte wrote:

> Modern writers that have started to properly research Theosophy (a
> large job indeed) are Carlson who wrote a book on Theosophy in Russia
> (*) , K.Paul Johnson, even he stated that he has been more apologetic
> in his books then he would be today about Blavatsky.

A quite natural and logical development. Someone who for a certain longer or
shorter time has had a glimpse or spark of the cosmic truths and was not
able to hold it, is always forced to destroy what he/she cannot possess. Is
that familiar to you?

That someone is not able to understand HPB is no proof that HPB was wrong,
it is just a proof of the avidya of this someone.
Frank