Theos-Talk Archives (August 2002 Message tt00275)

In a message dated 08/29/02 6:08:02 PM, brianmuehlbach@yahoo.com writes:

> If your belief is based on "inner feelings" (the "inner man") , "religion"
>("Theos-" ) or even so-called "common sense" as you might claim, it is
>far more likely to be wrong than theories based on scientific evidence.
>
> If what you claim is based on more then religious faith then
> present the evidence that supports SD creation myth, the posting below
>and the content of your two previous postings. And I' be glad to discuss
>them. 
> 
>Brian

Waste of time -- since all your "limited" physicalist scientific evidence is 
based solely on the lowest or densest "material" plane of universal 
involution and evolution, and hasn't a clue about the cause, nature, 
experience, or mechanisms of consciousness, thought, perception, awareness, 
etc... And, cannot discuss the relationship between, or "binding" of brain 
and mind from an objective scientific level, or explain ESP, ASC, action at a 
distance or quantum entanglement, and other seminal questions that completely 
baffle established reductive science (but not theosophical "deductive 
science"). 

Besides, the SD does not support the "creation myth" of universal origin ex 
nihilo, since its teachings re universal Cosmogenesis -- originating lawfully 
out of the primal singularity or zero-point of infinite potential angular 
momenta or "spinergy" -- are based solely on fundamental cyclic laws that are 
logically and mathematically sound... Some of which (re: "coadunate but not 
consubstantial enfolded fields" in at least three to ten+ dimensions, 
following laws of electricity as well as quantum and relativity physics, 
zero-point energy, zero-point origination of all fields, etc.) has been fully 
confirmed by the cutting edge developments of Superstring/M-brane theory that 
has falsified or modified much of conventional modern physics (which they 
admit, doesn't have to be correct or truthful, so long as it works in the 
limited area of its concern... i.e., The metric physical "space time 
continuum." 

So, the fact that quantum physics can give us digital computers, CD's and 
cell phones, doesn't mean it knows anything about how the metric physical 
universe composed of the "particles" they work with, came about, or 
originated... And, from where or what? As for anthropological opinions of 
Man's origins and evolution -- their "evidence " is so sparse, and their 
conclusions so far from being "scientific" as to be completely ignored as a 
basis of logical discussion.

Suggest you seriously study the "Secret Doctrine" and find out for yourself 
what it really teaches, instead of basing your prejudicial denials of 
theosophy and bashing of HPB on second hand opinions, Nazi propaganda, and 
flawed physical science.

LHM