Theos-Talk Archives (August 2002 Message tt00254)

In a message dated 08/25/02 4:39:27 PM, bartl@sprynet.com writes:

>brianmuehlbach wrote:
>> Bart:Zero point energy is a corollary to the Heisenberg Uncertainty
>> Principle, where it can be shown that if you remove all energy from a
>> point in space, there is still energy there. This is in line with
>> Blavatsky's statement that there is no empty space.
>> 
>> Brian:The above is not correct, and does not reflect quotes from
>> Blabatsky or what is in the SD.
>
> And you said lots of stuff, but nothing which specifically refutes
>anything I said.

Glad you noted that, Bart. So, now we don't have to waste any more time with 
scientific arguments that verify your statement, or offer any more references 
to prove that HPB said all there is to say about zero-points and zero-point 
energy (plus a lot more scientific metaphysical wisdom that so called 
"modern" or conventional reductive materialist "science" hasn't yet got a 
handle on -- although Superstring/M-brane theory is getting pretty close). 

It's typical of the way our former troll, Brigitte, who gave us so much 
trouble last year (and now hiding behind a pseudonym) continues arguing 
against theosophy and bashing HPB... By insisting on always having the last 
word by making opinionated and prejudiced negative assertions, and then 
offering as corroboration, a hodgepodge of non-sequitur, misunderstood and 
misinterpreted or outdated scientific gobbledygook (probably copied out of 
old elementary physics 101 textbooks or popular science articles) that have 
nothing to do directly with the assertions made or the statements being 
refuted. 

LHM