Theos-Talk Archives (August 2002 Message tt00195)

brianmuehlbach wrote:
> 
> Well these few short sentences are not a "huge body" as you previously
> claimed, 

Did you read the message that came with it? By your statement, you
clearly did not. 

> by way not even the length of one third of one of the e-mails
> Dallas sends on a daily basis to this list. 

Dallas clearly has much more free time on his hands than I do.


> -The "Big Bang" theory of the origin of the Universe.
> 
> -Zero point energy.
> 
> Can you explain at least what you mean by these terms ?

The "Big Bang" theory of the Universe is the belief that the Universe
was originally a single, undifferentiated mass, which, due to internal
pressures, exploded and reformed into differentiated space. Not unlike
the Stanzas of Dzyan, among other writings.

Zero point energy is a corollary to the Heisenberg Uncertainty
Principle, where it can be shown that if you remove all energy from a
point in space, there is still energy there. This is in line with
Blavatsky's statement that there is no empty space. 

> And do you have science to back up your religious opinion, reg. "the 
> Big Bang theory" and "Zero point energy" the way it is formulated in
> Blavatsky's writings ?

In the United States, at least, this is taught in high school physics. 

Bart Lidofsky