Theos-Talk Archives (August 2002 Message tt00124)

As I see it, there seems to be an overwhelming tendency 
among people in general to convert EVERYTHING (even 
the essential goal of meditation, I suspect, in many cases) 
into "understandable"/exoteric/dualistic terms, regardless of 
whether a key part of that everything might be better off 
seen as truly esoteric (ie, that which can ONLY be 
experienced, and that which cannot be translated into 
exoteric/dualistic "understandable terms." 

So, in other words, those who are critical of the exoteric 
version of Theosophy, for exampale (which seems to be the 
only version that's at all "understandable," in whatever 
way?), are (IMHO) often side-stepping (aparently?) all but 
obvious duality, exoterics, maya.

I was under the impression that even many respected 
mainstream scientists have been, for some time now, 
admitting to a reality that's more than dualistic.

Speculatively,
Mauri