Theos-Talk Archives (August 2002 Message tt00117)

I saw nothing there that severely contradicts what Blavatsky or the
Mahatmas wrote about the Root Races. Certainly, it contradicts what a
number of the later writers wrote, but they contradicted Blavatsky and
the Mahatmas, so it is not surprising. 

Also, I saw nothing there that even ADDRESSED the theosophical concept
of the root races. I read a couple of the other articles on the site,
and noticed that, even though they had the word "Theosophy" in the
title, had nothing whatsoever to do with Theosophy, except possibly
mention Blavatsky in a distantly related context.

Bart Lidofsky

brianmuehlbach wrote:
> 
> With subjects related to "The Esoteric / Transpersonal Tradition Today":
> 
> http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~muehleb9/index.html
> 
> 
> > --- In theos-talk@y..., Bart Lidofsky <bartl@s...> wrote:
> > > Mic Forster wrote:
> > > > Are the Aborigines of a lower evolutionary state than
> > > > the white man, as conjectured by Leadbeater and other
> > > > theosophists?
> > >
> > > Well, first of all, technically speaking, WE'RE at the lowest
> > > evolutionary state; remember, we reached this point from an
> > > INvolutionary process.
> > >
> > > According to the Mahatma Letters, the Aborigines have the
> > remnants of
> > > the CIVILIZATION of the 4th Root Race; this is what probably
> caused
> > the
> > > confusion. Certainly, from the description of the 4th Root Race, it is
> > > clear that their bodies were not what we currently call "humanoid."
> > >
> > > Bart Lidofsky
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/