[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Jul 12, 2002 06:57 PM
by Steve Stubbs
--- Mic Forster <micforster@yahoo.com> wrote: > So if laws originate a priori then how can we > determine whether these laws actually exist or a > merely products of pre-existing laws which were > discovered a priori? Touch of maya in there > somewhere, > I am sure. Yes, that is exactly what it is. I am not sure about this specific quote, but in his CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON, Kant uses the term "a priori" to refer to the way our brains are wired, so that there are the a priori contents of sensation (time and space) and the twelve a priori contents of understanding. These are not learnings (which he calls a posteriori) but precede all learning and experience and are imposed by out consciousness on what we experience and learn. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com