Theos-Talk Archives (May 2002 Message tt00209)

i like this perspective One traveling the concept ov the universe/existencethe fact as being this and/or that True to function not this not that An agreeable concept when traveling out side the realm ov function. The Para (beyond paranormal) Brahman (universal priest) A traveler ov de evulsion Truly remarkable position . The previous post is a purely experimental perspective. It is more a cause for controversy or just to make people think more than anything else. And the job has been effective. Thank You for sharing your perspective of the PaRaBRahmAn . A truly remarkable understanding. DaePaeC
Ademma

>Hi all of you,
>
>To all of you:
>
>Beautiful thoughts.
>
>But a 'new' universe is born ?
>'New' in what sense ?
>'Different' in what sense ?
>Is there 'time' there ?
>
>What is time ?
>Time is an illusion - on the different levels, but in another sense it is also Parabrahman, right ?
>There is only ParaBrahman.
>
>There is no duality
>There is no marriage.
>There is no sexuality.
>There is no phallic or feministic manners.
>It is 'beyond' - it is superior and 'transcended'.
>It is also a higher kind of sexuality, but not physical at all on that level !
>
>Let us be non-physical, and physical when time is right.
>
>There is only ParaBrahman.
>'is' it ? (I mean praBrahman)
>Is it 'it' ?
>Does it transcend 'it' ?
>
>ParaBrahman.
>THAT
>That which is not a problem.
>
>Let us transcend our limitations.
>Let us not be limited by words of 'existence'.
>Let us transcend 'existence' (in a 'beyondness') into Not This, Not That.
>And yet let all three , the 'existence', the 'universe' or 'multiuniverse' and 'Not This, Not That' merge together in a special sense beyond the reach of thoughts.
>
>It is really possible to be the ParaBrahman. To transcended 'Not This, notThat' - and not be limited.
>
>The answers are there in the text.
>You have heard it or read it.
>
>I am really exposing my self here. <:-)
>
>Now I want to eat some breakfast here in Denmark.
>I wonder how they get by in the poor countries, while the rich people get fat bellies.
>
>from
>Sufilight
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ademma Indraka" <oraganon@bellsouth.net>
>To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 4:33 AM
>Subject: Re: Theos-World Multiverse concept
>
>
>Oddly enough this would not be anything more than a modern interpretation ov Indra. Joseph Campbell described Siva as being forever asleep/in-motion.Every time she opened her eyes a new world(universe) was born and an Indrawas born with it to be its keeper(the central magnetic pole( big bang)).
>
>
>It would seem to me that the knowledge ov thee multi-universe would have agreat part ov thee greater half ov thee Hindu nation.
>
>In theory the universe has no bounds(no beginning and no
>end). The Idea of the universe can not be calculated in its entirety. So existence would be the only solid function in collation with the universe.
> (universe = existence)
>
>However the universe is a conception of existence. Existence is by far the most conceived aspect (the fact that all things exist) is the substance in which the concept of the universe exists. A concept can be duplicated.
>(existence > universe)
>
>
>Ademma
>
>
>
>redrosarian wrote.:.
>>Has anyone connected the seven planes presented by HPB with the
>>current quantum theory of the multiverse presented by David Deutsch?
>>I thought it interesting that Hugh Everett, the originator of the
>>multiverse concept in his 1957 Princeton doctoral thesis was given
>>credit for coming up with the "many worlds" interpretation of quantum
>>mechanics. HPB and the Vedas knew of this long before 1957.
>>
>>Curiously inquiring,
> >MNS
>>
>

-- 
:.:":Š::,.,,;"'.:. ;,.'::.":;,.,'.,:;',,::..':.;,,";"',,:;,,Š.:.:":Š::,.,,;"'.:. ;,.'::.":;,.,'.,:;',,::..':.;,,";"',,:;,,Š.:.:":Š::,.,,;"'.:. ;,
LLETA VUNDA MIKKA INANA EDIFI
ORAGANON CULTURAL INDUSTRIES

oraganon@bellsouth.net
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oraganon/

meccaR.S.V.P.- Experimental Sound; Exp
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oraganon/files/