Theos-Talk Archives (May 2002 Message tt00098)

In a message dated 05/09/02 11:36:48 AM, bilmer@surfsouth.com writes:

>I suppose that one who sees from a position so lofty that he/she can
>laughingly label others as "inconsequential" has arrived at the source
>of his/her own delusion.

"Inconsequential" to this list was meant. But, your response is a good 
theosophical (and, thus, consequential:-) observation. Especially since the 
source of all delusion is the lower self... And, to arrive at such 
understanding (from the point of view of the higher mind) and, thus, come 
closer to "Self Realization" or enlightenment -- is the purpose of 
theosophical study and practice -- that, as we all should know, this list (as 
an offshoot of *Theosophy World* magazine) was designed to discuss.

>> leonmaurer@aol.com wrote:
>> > Very interrrresting. But who cares? Let's assume it was only forwarded
>> > to this list, tongue in cheek, to make a point about how we might fall 
into
>> > the trap of judging each other on emotional levels (and wake up some of
>> > the inconsequential members who just like to nit pick outside of straight
>> > theosophical discussion.:-)
>>
>> It was an example, more precisely, that, by only making lies,
>> half-truths and carefully edited facts available, people will come to
>> the wrong conclusions. Hardly a great revelation.
>>
>> It does show one reason why the United States, with its free press, was
>> chosen as the place to start the Theosophical Society.
>>
>> Bart Lidofsky

Are Eldon and Dallas the only ones here who understood the message of the "2 
questions for thinkers"? 

LHM