Theos-Talk Archives (May 2002 Message tt00081)

ARE WE THERE YET?!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce F. MacDonald" <b.macdonald@sasktel.net>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World 2 questions


> Bill and Frank,
> Is this some kind of "two kids in the back seat, nya nya
> nya" humour?
> You did, no I didn't, yes you did, no I didn't, you did so, no I
> didn't, yes you did, I'm going to tell Mom on you, Well I'll tell Dad on
YOU.
>
> Peace, Be Still !!! Bruce MacD
>
> At 04:10 AM 5/9/02 +0200, you wrote:
> >Next Tue we have next theos. meeting. I'll print that email out and show
it
> >around (as I sometimes do) as many can't imagine what kind of
"theosophists"
> >are out there.
> >With those "theosophists" who are obvioulsy the majority here we have no
> >need for foes...
> >
> >But be it as it is, as you are a very clver guy I thank you very much
that
> >you know better than I what I said and what not!
> >You not expect that I explain you what an argument is. Even a little bit
of
> >educational prepatory should be self evident even here!
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Frank Reitemeyer" <dhyana@web.de>
> >To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 7:26 PM
> >Subject: Re: Theos-World 2 questions
> >
> >
> > > Don't project your thought onto others.
> >
> >Don't project your thought onto others.
> >
> > > I never said that being crucified and being fired are the same thing.
> >
> >Yes you did.
> >
> > > Just a little explanation as it seems that my simple argument was to
> > > difficult to you.
> >
> >If you can call what you wrote an "argument" then the English language is
> >"to difficult to you."
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Bill Meredith" <bilmer@surfsouth.com>
> > > To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:07 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Theos-World 2 questions
> > >
> > >
> > > You missed the point entirely, but it is.......
> > >
> > > Good to know that being crucified and being fired are the same thing
> > > (according to your logic).
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Frank Reitemeyer" <dhyana@web.de>
> > > To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:51 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Theos-World 2 questions
> > >
> > >
> > > > >correctly or something like that. Nobody is going to
> > > > >fire a man for acting ethically and refusing ro
> > > > >particpate in fraud.
> > > >
> > > > Good to know. That Jesus was crossed then is a clear proof (at least
> > > > according to your logic) that he was a charlatan.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> >http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>