Re: What does "coadunate' mean?
Apr 02, 2002 00:46 AM
>From the American Heritage dictionary:
co'ad'u'nate adj. 1. Closely joined; grown together; united.
>From Merriam Websters Collegiate Thesaurus:
Entry Word: coadunate
Text: Synonyms JOIN 1, associate, coagment, coalesce, connect, link, one,
relate, unite, wed
The statement "coadunate but not consubstantial" is attributed to HPB who
used this phrase to describe the transcendent relationships of the seven fold
fields of consciousness in both the SD and in her other writings on
It refers specifically to both the zero (laya) points which, being
dimensionless, are all in the same spatial location, or "entangled" (as they
say in modern physic), as well as to the separate multidimensional fields of
consciousness which are connected coenergetically through their zero points
(where their energy rays cross and are transformed, or transmuted, from one
frequency-energy "phase" or "order" to another).
The differences in these frequency levels or "spectrum" ranges within the
Planck distance surrounding each coadunate zero-point, are where the energy
momenta and frequencies of the two adjoining fields (physical and astral)
become chaotic and indeterminate due to their frequency and velocity phase
interference's. That is why -- at the quantum level (the Planck distance of
approximately 10^-32 cm from the zero-point) -- if the electron position is
measured, its momentum is indeterminate, and if its momentum is measured its
position is indeterminate.
This is because the limit of measurement of the material instrument, or
"observer", governed by the maximum frequency of electromagnetic waves on the
physical phase or plane, cannot penetrate beyond the barrier of the Planck
distance -- where the different frequency spectrums of the coadunate higher
order energy fields interfere with each other and give chaotic measurements
that science labels as the "probability" function, and which is wrongly
interpreted by some shallow thinkers as negating causation and the immutable
laws governing karma or "action" based on eternal cyclic motion reflected on
every plane, field, or level of consciousness. Also, according to an
extension of string theory mathematics, the velocity of astromagnetic light
waves would have to be the velocity of electromagnetic light squared (C^2)...
And, is why we can only see such light, internally with our "third eye," as
"mental images" -- whether awake or dreaming.
All that, incidentally, is also why theosophy can say (irrefutable by either
science or logic), that the universe is nothing more than consciousness (or
spirit) in motion, and that physical matter or mass-energy is but one low
level aspect of a vast (3, 7, 10, 14, etc., fold) expanse of "coadunate but
not consubstantial" energy fields ranging from the sublime to the gross...
Or, ranging from the near infinite frequency spectrum of the primal at(o)mic
field, through the five intermediate fields, to the gross, lower energy phase
electromagnetic frequency spectrum of the physical, sidereal, or mass-energy
field. Interestingly, M-brane theorists see the universe in a similar
manner, and their open or closed "strings" (which, as they say, "vibrate like
guitar strings of different tensions") are nothing more than the lines of
primal force or emanative "rays" spoken of in theosophy.
For a clear symbolic cross sectional picture of how these octaval
(diatonically intervalic) coadunate fields (and their "chakra" centers or
individualized zero-points of intersection) multidimensionally involve out of
the "Absolute" zero point "spinergy" (or "abstract motion")... And, why all
duality's are each integral or inseparable parts of a "trinity" which, when
further differentiated, becomes septenary and then centenary -- but always
remain an interconnected "unity"... See:
Hope this helps.
In a message dated 04/01/02 5:59:38 AM, Teos 9 writes:
>I have looked in a couple of online dictionaries for the meaning of this
>term. No listing for this word, is all I get. Could you please enlighten
>me a bit about your intended meaning when you use the word. I get the part
>about consubstantial or not consubstantial, as in: "the same as" or not
>"the same as." However I am at a loss to glimpse, or infer any meaning
>from "coadunate or adunate." Thanks for any help you can give e here.
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application