Theos-Talk Archives (March 2002 Message tt00330)

If Olcott says he met a real physical man, I think it
is reasonable to say that he met a real physical man.
I have maintained that all along. Why do you keep
asking?

--- Daniel Caldwell <danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thanks Steve for your comments at:
> 
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UniversalSeekers/message/3308
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/messages
> 
> Steve, if I correctly understand your thinking, then
> you are saying that in each of the following four
> cases [see links below], your conclusion would be
> that
> "Olcott met a real physical man who was an
> adept/master." Right?
> 
>
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/chart4stepmorya79bm.htm
>
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/chart4stepmorya80bm.htm
>
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/chart4stepgoldtem80bm.htm
>
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/chart4stepmorya81bm.htm
> 
> Once again I appreciate your forthright and
> thoughtful
> comments on this topic.
> 
> =====
> Daniel H. Caldwell
> BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
> http://blavatskyarchives.com/introduction.htm
> "...Contrast alone can enable us to appreciate
> things at
> their right value; and unless a judge compares notes
> and
> hears both sides he can hardly come to a correct
> decision."
> H.P. Blavatsky. The Theosophist, July, 1881, p. 218.
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
> http://sports.yahoo.com/
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
http://sports.yahoo.com/