Almeder Versus Coleman on Survival
Mar 14, 2002 06:33 PM
Brigitte Muehlegger wrote:
"In a review of Almeder's earlier 'Beyond Death' in the Journal of
Psychical Research , April 1989, the reviewer, Michael Coleman, after
listing Almeder's numerous quite outrageous distortions,
remarks: 'Such practices would be reprehensible in a Layman and are
inexcusable in a professional philosopher.' "
Of course, the reader has no idea from the above exactly what Coleman
is writing about so there is no way to judge the reasonableness of
But if any reader wants to follow up on what Muehlegger is referring
to, then they should ALSO read:
"Almeder Versus Coleman on Survival" by Robert Almeder in the Journal
of the Society for Psychical Research (London) July l994.
Daniel H. Caldwell
"...Contrast alone can enable us to appreciate things at
their right value; and unless a judge compares notes and
hears both sides he can hardly come to a correct decision."
H.P. Blavatsky. The Theosophist, July, 1881, p. 218.
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application