[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

A question for clarification

Feb 24, 2002 00:29 AM
by Daniel Caldwell

Brigitte, you write:

"Dr. Stephen Braude's book THE LIMITS OF INFLUENCE,
his first chapter on 'The importance of
non-experimental evidence' does not provide any
evidence beyond the existence of certain psychic
abilities, and some aspects of the Ganzfeld theory
that are much more 
up to date explained in Dean I. Radin's book that is
much more up to date, yet denies the
medium/materialisation con as a reality."

I am somewhat confused by what you write above.

". . . denies the medium/materialisation con as a
reality." ?? What does this mean??

Are you telling me that Radin in his book gives the
opinion that mediumship and materializations are a
"con" and therefore "not real"? Could you cite pages
please? I would like to read what Radin writes and
see what the SPECIFIC REASONS are for this statement.

OBTW, have you read Braude's book and have you read
the first chapter of that book?

Daniel H. Caldwell
"...Contrast alone can enable us to appreciate things at
their right value; and unless a judge compares notes and
hears both sides he can hardly come to a correct decision."
H.P. Blavatsky. The Theosophist, July, 1881, p. 218.

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games

[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application