Theos-Talk Archives (February 2002 Message tt00682)

Hi Brigitte and all of you,

Agreed.

from
Sufilight with hard work, help from a florist, one of many Avatars...and some tears...


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "bri_mue" <bri_mue@yahoo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 5:13 PM
Subject: Theos-World Romantic occultism , versus 21th century science.


> Sufilight: "a compressed teaching on LIFE it self." 
> 
> Depends what you understand under "life", flowers ?
> 
> Bri.
> 
> --- In theos-talk@y..., "Morten Sufilight" <teosophy@m...> wrote:
> > Hi all of you,
> > 
> > Brigitte wrote:
> > "Applications of something similar to zero point energy in the 
> > > process of being undertaken but practical applications of this 
> have 
> > > so far not existed. It is because some people take a religious 
> > > occult book like the SD instead of as interesting invented myth 
> with 
> > > symbolic meaning , as fact that the TS has been losing 
> membership 
> > > so fast."
> > 
> > A view among many:
> > Now I hope I don't misunderstand your syntax.
> > My answer is, - No - I really think you are wrong here in the above 
> quote Brigitte. I think that Theosophy and the wisdom teachings of 
> all ages - have had or has a PR-problem - which though is on its way 
> to be solved. And because of that a lot of people has misunderstood, 
> what theosophy (the wisdom teachings of all ages) really is, and also 
> what Theosophy (i.e. certain honest seeking organizations) really is 
> doing its best to say.
> > I think Theosophy is a part of theosophy - if one understand it 
> properly with the mind of wisdom and the heart of compassion. But 
> this doesn't imply, that no Theosophical author so to speak or 
> another Theosophist hasn't made any mistake. I think they have, i.e. 
> not being, what we ordinarily call Avatars of the age. 
> > And I also think, that you Brigitte are NOT helping - the wisdom 
> teaching of all ages by this remark in the above quote. I.e. this 
> remark above. I wonder, what made you write it ?
> > 
> > The 'thing' with the Secret Doctrine - is to me, that it contains - 
> a compressed teaching on LIFE it self. And - that - is the wisdom 
> teaching of all ages. That is what is called theosophy by some. But, 
> I think ones head has to be 'spinning' somewhat the see that clearly.
> > 
> > And on the rest part of your interesting email. It is quite 
> important - this anti-gravity no mistake there.
> > I will just say this: 
> > My 'flying spoon' and I don't care about physical whichles, when I 
> am flying high mentally in the galaxies with my imaginary spoon in 
> the pocket. ;-) smile...
> > 
> > But of course, what one normally will call 'new' inventions - is of 
> interest to some of us.
> > There is a physical universe to explore - yes. And that is very 
> interesting - to many for sure. 
> > But, when I say, that there are mental universes to explore - 
> people think I am sick, - because they havn't seen any such universe
> (s) themselves.
> > 
> > Try this - antigravity model: http://www.enterprisemission.com/anti-
> grav.htm
> > (Einstein didn't know everything.)
> > One could ask if NASA is keeping this secret from the Muslims - 
> couldn't one accuse them for plotting terrorism ? Or one could at 
> least say, that it isn't free science for everyone and free 
> humanistic thinking, - and that it is against the image NASA likes to 
> create internationally.
> > 
> > The sufi's are also named as 'heart-spies' and not 'hard-pies'.
> > 
> > Feel free to do your best
> > 
> > 
> > from
> > Sufilight with the Rugrat called "Sick" and a Flying Circus...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "bri_mue" <bri_mue@y...>
> > To: <theos-talk@y...>
> > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 3:40 PM
> > Subject: Theos-World Romantic occultism , versus 21th century 
> science.
> > 
> > 
> > > Applications of something similar to zero point energy in the 
> > > process of being undertaken but practical applications of this 
> have 
> > > so far not existed. It is because some people take a religious 
> > > occult book like the SD instead of as interesting invented myth 
> with 
> > > symbolic meaning , as fact that the TS has been losing 
> membership 
> > > so fast.
> > > 
> > > In October 2000, the US magazine Popular Mechanics for example 
> Ning 
> > > Li, the Chinese-American scientist working in an area of 
> endeavour 
> > > similar to Dr Evgeny Podkletnov, was close to developing an 
> > > operational machine capable of exerting an attractive or 
> repulsive 
> > > force on all matter. By using 12-inch disc-shaped superconductors 
> and 
> > > around a kilowatt of electricity, Li's device would produce a 
> force 
> > > field, the magazine stated, that would 'effectively neutralize 
> > > gravity above a 1-ft diameter region extending from the surface 
> of 
> > > the planet to outer space.' Li left the University of Alabama at 
> > > Huntsville in mid-2000 to pursue the commercial development of 
> her 
> > > invention and has kept a low-profile since. While her eye is said 
> to 
> > > be on civilian spin-offs of this remarkable breakthrough - NASA 
> > > scientists at the Marshall Space Flight Center believe her "AC 
> > > Gravity" machine could be used as a shield for protecting the 
> > > International Space Station against impacts by small 
> meteorites.But 
> > > this has notting to do with what is in the SD.
> > > 
> > > Current research is being undertaken and also first tests reg. a 
> > > first application of such an AC Gravity mashine. And the only 
> thing 
> > > one could say is that like Jules Verne in his fantasie has 
> foreseen 
> > > certain things in his fiction books, the same can be said about 
> Keely 
> > > and the SD.
> > 
> >  
>   
> > > Bri.
> > >      
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 
>