Re: Theos-World Re: Sanskrit terms and book-lore or metaphysics.
Feb 19, 2002 10:21 AM
by Morten Sufilight
First - 'chuck' must be 'Chuck' I think. Am I right?
Yes. It got Chuck's joke - and it was fun. It was FUN - allright.
But - is the wish - that Sai Baba should disappear - fun ? Well maybe - andmaybe not. This is seroius stuff - this.
The answer is, that readers could be happy about knowing this word.
Now you, with your rethoric, almost seem to want me to stop helping people.
I have never said, that I can read the Akasha - totally, please let us keepthe facts in mind Brigitte.
(Do you think I am a Mulla Nashreddin with a lamp ?? )
I don't think, that I am that old. I think I am young and ready for anything.
So how old are you ? Do you feel old ?
Sufilight with a worthy and smiling dictionary...
----- Original Message -----
From: "bri_mue" <email@example.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 6:39 PM
Subject: Theos-World Re: Sanskrit terms and book-lore or metaphysics.
Sufiflight, you should try in this case not look at Webster, but
check your intuition what chuck ment. Didn't you say you believed
only in the akashic records ?
Then why you suddenly check Webster ? This old brainpower of yours
taking over for some reason ?
--- In theos-talk@y..., "Morten Sufilight" <teosophy@m...> wrote:
> Hi Chuck and all of you,
> Why Chuck ?
> Meriam Webster Dictionary gave this on the word 'retroactively ' :
> Main Entry: ret·ro·ac·tive
> Pronunciation: -'ak-tiv
> Function: adjective
> Etymology: French rétroactif, from Latin retroactus, past
participle of retroagere to drive back, reverse, from retro- + agere
to drive -- more at AGENT
> Date: 1611
> : extending in scope or effect to a prior time or to conditions
that existed or originated in the past; especially : made effective
as of a date prior to enactment, promulgation, or imposition
> - ret·ro·ac·tive·ly adverb
> - ret·ro·ac·tiv·i·ty /-"ak-'ti-v&-tE/ noun '
> The present is now ! Not in the past ! (or is it the future ?)
> A story:
> The Middle Eastern - cosmic joke - Mulla Nashreddin was once
together with a group of people bragging up about, that he could walk
in the dark with no lamp.
> Ha !, said one of them - didn't some of us not see you the other
day walking about at night with a lamp ? Can you explain that ?
> The Mulla : "Yes. But I carried the lamp with me, so that you and
other people shouldn't run in to me."
> Sufilight being present...and the Rugrats too...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Drpsionic@a...>
> To: <theos-talk@y...>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 4:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: Sanskrit terms and book-lore or
> > In a message dated 2/19/02 6:48:15 AM Central Standard Time,
> > teosophy@m... writes:
> > << Does the below imply, that you think that the world would be
better of, if
> > Sai Baba wanished - physically ?
> > >>
> > Especially if he could do it retroactively.
> > Chuck the Heretic
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application