Theos-Talk Archives (February 2002 Message tt00284)

Hi all of you,

Here is a short quote from The Secret Doctrine by Blavatsky on the 20th century person, who (maybe) would enhance - or even prove the science of GUPTA-VIDYA :


"The same may be said of the whole Esoteric system. One turn of the key, and no more, was given in "Isis." Much more is explained in these volumes. In those days the writer hardly knew the language in which the work was written, and the disclosure of many things, freely spoken about now, was forbidden. In Century the Twentieth some disciple more informed, and far better fitted, may be sent by the Masters of Wisdom to give final and irrefutable proofs that there exists a Science called Gupta-Vidya; and that, like the once-mysterious sources of the Nile, the source of all religions and philosophies now known to the world has been for many ages forgotten and lost to men, but is at last found." (The Secret Doctrine by H. P. Blavatsky; vol.1; p.xxxviii )

Now some on the Internet has put their fingers on:
a) 'the Compiler' (idea from Brigitte)
b) CWL (which I think must be Charles Webster Leadbeater) (idea from John Beers)

c) Gurdjieff (idea from Paul K. Johnson)


I can't agree on the three above. They simply hasn't shown the above irrefutable proofs - on Gupta Vidya.

So I ask again, slightly different, who could that person be ? Writer or not ?

Anyway who was that person if any which Blavatsky made a prediction about ?? I ask all of you...??

Ideas are: Daghestani, Idries Shah, Sai Baba, Alice A. Bailey, Ghandi, Martin Luther King Jr., Krishnamurti, Kidhr(:-)), R. Steiner, Radha Burnier, and who knows ?....

When talking about showing PROOF on Gupta Vidya - the Sai Baba seems to be the most likely candidate according to me, when comparing all of the above. (Well I know there a rumours about him as being a sexabuser and a fake, but as I see it there are no real exact proofs yet... And let us remember, that the wise also from time to time acts as a designer - i.e. with the meaning - teaching while 'exposing' him/herself...But the designer should not harm people. But others will certainly disagree with me.)

from 
Sufilight with...and friends


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]