theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Differing Interpretations of Olcott's Encounters with the Masters

Feb 09, 2002 07:46 AM
by danielhcaldwell


If you click on the link below, you will see a chart labelled:

"Differing Interpretations of Some of Olcott's Encounters with the 
Masters"

http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/masterschart.htm

The chart tries to COMPARE Steve Stubbs' interpretation or view of 
Olcott's encounters with the Masters with the views of K. Paul 
Johnson and Brigitte Mühlegger.

Click on the individual cases to see the actual testimony of Olcott.
Also click on the phrases "corporeal men", "two real adepts" and
"fantasy or confederates ?" to see some of the comments by Stubbs, 
Johnson and Mühlegger.  

I have added several question marks to Johnson's column since I'm 
unsure exactly what his specific explanation for some of the cases 
would be. I've added a question mark in all of Mühlegger's "boxes" 
since she has not indicated whether she actually prefers 
the "fantasy" or the "confederate" explanation for any specific 
case. But see her views as given in the link labelled "fantasy or 
confederates ?" 

In my next posting I will explain what I'm trying to accomplish with 
this chart.

Daniel H. Caldwell
BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/introduction.htm




[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application