Re: to Gerald -
Jan 31, 2002 12:57 PM
by cronjev
--- In theos-talk@y..., "Gerald Schueler" <gschueler@e...> wrote:
> <<<My biggest problem with most religions, or belief systems, is
their failure to be able to explain the mystical, or the creation of
mysticism.>>>
>
> All of our human thought-systems are belief systems. Religion is a
belief system. Atheism is a belief system. Agnosticism is a belief
system. Science is a belief system. Mysticism is also a belief
system, as is Theosophy.
-->Bad sentence construction, it should read 'most OTHER religions or
belief systems'. Of course, most people will be just as flabbergasted
at my views of the universe, as I am of theirs. That is my main
reason for trying to develop emprirical proof of my theories. This
would require some more thought, but I'm on the right path.
-----------
> <<<I also believe that when we are searching for answers for our
existence, we can't separate the ultimate goal of the human race from
the goal of everything else in the Universe. We are all part of the
same system.>>>
>
> Belief that we are part of the universe is also a belief system,
although I agree that it is a very good one. What is the "ultimate
goal of the human race?" How one answers that question will tell much
about the Path that person takes.
> <<<I also strongly believe that searching for answers to the
mysteries of the Universe, can give you practical solutions for
living a rich and
> fulfilling life.>>>
>
> What it actually does give us is a sense of meaning, and this is
what is really important. In my own belief system, there are no
external inherently existing "facts" or "laws" to be discovered.
>
------>( I just put that bit in to get more people interested in
philosophy, Rewards of success/love and/or happiness are great
incentives. The questions we ask currently are but just the next step
in out global cultural intelligence evolution.)
>
> <<<I will put forth that the most mystical, in fact the only
mystical, unexplainable phenomena in the Universe is the concept
of "nothing" or "zero". A main reason for our inability to explain
it, (other than putting it into relation to "something"), is because
it is such a simple and basic concept. >>>
>
> Interesting model. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
>
> Jerry S.
My model was basically my religious rebirth. This is but my first
attempt to write some of my ideas down, my writing acumen would
surely improve with practise. I also have not discovered any further
reading that disproves my statements thus far, or am too blind to see
it - would love to have it pointed out.
Cronje
(I put the ramblings on the net as well, for more public scrutiny.
I'll make it pretty when I have time)
www.geocities.com/cronjev
- References:
- Re to Cronje
- From: "Gerald Schueler" <gschueler@earthlink.net>
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application