Theos-Talk Archives (January 2002 Message tt00377)

Brigitte Mühlegger wrote in part:

> Daniel: "Contradictory and Conflicting Speculation" 
> 
> Brigitte: Wich is the suggestive way Daniel wants to influence 
> members of this list to believe it, instead of the 
> historical "research" it is shared with each other by members of 
> this "discussion" e-mail group.

Dear Brigitte Mühlegger, 

Are you trying to (indirectly) tell the members of this list that 
there is actually no conflict or contradiction between what you wrote 
and what Steve Stubbs and K. Paul Johnson wrote as cited in:

http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/contradictions.htm

You challenged Adelasie to answer the following question:

"Can you quote anything a toll in either Isis or the SD that was not 
publicly available already in other books that time?" 

I agree it is a crucial question that raised an important issue and 
should be seriously considered not only by Adelasie but by everyone 
on this list who has a real interest in the subject matter. 

So in light of that challenge, I thought I would bring to the 
attention of readers what Steve Stubbs had also recently wrote on the 
same subject and what K. Paul Johnson wrote in a somewhat similar 
vein in his work which you frequently refer to on this list.

I don't think you should gloss over the issue of the contradiction. 
But if you don't want to address the point, that's fine. 

If your view actually differs from that of Stubbs or Johnson, don't 
be reluctant to admit that fact. 

Also Adelasie might find Stubbs' and Johnson's views helpful and 
relevant if she tries to answer your question to her.

Daniel H. Caldwell
BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
http://hpb.cc