Theos-Talk Archives (December 2001 Message tt00494)

Bridgette,
Thank you for the review of the various assignments in regard to
"Tulku" from the several resources you have shown. One reason
I posted the Osel Tenzin Rinpoche Homepage to you was that one
who documented Osel from a Babe of a few months until present is
a German Journalist of German language naturally. I hoped that 
you
in your full examination of the Osel Website would detect this 
and 
perhaps enage in correspondence about Tulku Osel and appraise us
in due time. 

I myself as I intimated hold the opinion that Tulku though 
having
been notarized somewhat exclusively by the Tibetans was not 
limited
to them. My base reason for this is that Tulku presents that it 
is the Being
,who having through means arrives to the State called Tulku. That 
means
that it is also intimate to Nirmanakaya . Tulku describes a 
condition of the Consciousness and Beingness of an Individual. 
The "Tests' to Authenticate
Tulku use as resource Personal Objects that must be correctly 
recognized
and choosen from many before the Candidate that were possessed by 
the former living Lama or Personality of which they were . It is 
the continiuty of
consciousness itself that allows this performance to take place. 
The same 
continuity of consciousness informs when Recognition is given at 
first sight
when seeing their former Instructors or cherished Friends. The 
Dalai Lama 
himself performed the same as a child. As far as the Dual Reflex 
of the Buddha
as regards the Dalai and Tashi Lama's that is another subject and 
another dynamic realm. 

One thing that often struck me as a correlate is to be found in 
the Gnostic
Pistis Sophia, wherein the Apostles present on the mount of The 
Transfiguration
have direct perception of Jesus the Christ and one approaches him 
and is 
cautioned "touch me not- as I have not yet assembled my Members". 
To me at 
least the Gnostic appear to also have the tradition of the "Econony 
of the Being"
as this seems to intimate that so close to the loss of the physical 
body yet a 
period is necessary in order that a ideal integration of the 
Principles be yet
completed and the intrusion by an apostles physicallity and contact 
would 
disturb the processes. It seems to me that "Transfiguration" is 
intimate to
Nirmanakaya also.

I am not sure what your communication is in the manner you state 
"Barbouka's
theory of Blavatsky". What is it you are telling me? Did you read all 
of Barbourka's
Book or skim using the index? I await your reply.

Thanks for your effort, I apprecieate it.

John