Theos-Talk Archives (December 2001 Message tt00270)

But that does not imply that those many who laugh are the wiser ones or the
ones who have a first hand knowledge.
My own humble experience of life showed me that those who laugh, don't laugh
because they know more but rather because they know lesser.
Frank

----- Original Message -----
From: <Drpsionic@aol.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 6:58 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Steve's hypothesis about Blavatsky, Olcott and the
"sense dis...


In a message dated 12/12/01 5:27:46 PM Central Standard Time,
bilmer@surfsouth.com writes:

<< I've also noticed an almost embarrassing effort to minimize
Blavatsky's sexual activity -- especially with her first husband. What's
the story there? She married and then left when? Weeks or months later,
but still with her virginity intact? Whatever difference would it make
either way? Why struggle to give the impression that she was sexually
innocent?
Bill >>

You notice right!

Like I said, it was something that was important to the Victorians and our
folks just have this need to carry it over into the 21st century. All that
sort of thing does is make us look less virtuous than ridiculous. A lot of
us have been laughing at that for a very long time.

Chuck the Heretic



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/