Theos-Talk Archives (December 2001 Message tt00247)

Dallas wrote:

> I note from the dates of the material quoted [ Hannah Wolfe, and
> Albert Rawson ] that they appear in journals AFTER the death of
> Mme. Blavatsky (she died May 8th 1891).
> 
> These reports were published in 2 separate magazines -- see
> below -- Jen. and in Feb. 1892). She had no opportunity to see
> or to answer them.

Dallas, I fail to see your point. Yes, Blavatsky was dead in 1892 
and could not answer the charges.

But does that mean that the claims by Wolfe and Rawson are therefore 
automatically to be discounted; that they are automatically FALSE?

Madame Coulomb's charges against HPB were made DURING HPB's lifetime.
Does that mean that they are therefore more credible?

Dallas, you also write:

> Coleman's reports have been found and shown to be defective long
> back, while H P B was still alive.

Exactly what are you referring to here? What is the primary source 
doucmentation here? 

Again Dallas, you write:

> D. D. Home. never met Mme. Blavatsky while she was alive.
> Theosophy Magazine, July 1931, p. 416, Vol. 19. ] Both had
> great enmity for H P B.

But Theosophy magazine like the Godwin and Deveney books are 
secondary sources. What primary sources does the Theosophy magazine 
writer cite to show that Home never met HPB?

Daniel H. Caldwell
BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
http://hpb.cc