Theos-Talk Archives (December 2001 Message tt00047)

Dear Dallas

Just to take the first Aphorism:

(1) There is no Karma unless there is a being to make it or feel
its effects.

Is this actually the case?

After the 15 number Manvantara...Pralaya...then the next Manvantara. Isn't
that Karma? Isn't karma's "abode" the Absolute. IT ART ITSELF LAW ("Key
to Theosophy, page 65) And on this same page regarding the Absolute: ". . .
as it is absolute existence, and *Be-ness*, not a Being."

In the Glossary ("Key to Theosophy") ". . . Karma neither punishes nor
rewards; it is simply *the one* Universal LAW which guides unerringly . . ."

Why the need for a being (as per the aphorism)? Be-ness IS. Without
karma, how could there ever be a being?

Tony



-----Original Message-----
From: dalval14@earthlink.net [mailto:dalval14@earthlink.net]
Sent: 4 December 2001 7:53 pm
To: study@blavatsky.net
Subject: Theos-World RE: [bn-study] RE: Karma an important Law of Nature


Tuesday, December 04, 2001

Dear Friend:

Let me add to this the APHORISMS on KARMA -- which can be of
help to us all

Dallas

===============

APHORISMS ON KARMA

(1) There is no Karma unless there is a being to make it or feel
its effects.

CUT