Theos-Talk Archives (December 2001 Message tt00003)

Friday, November 30, 2001


Dear Jerry:

You are a Monad and so am I as I understand it -- at the
root-base of our being,

But we both know that we are also a composite of many different
things.

So in one way we are a unit ATMA

But to manifest the ATMA needs many vehicles or sheaths.

That's all i am trying to say.

BUDDHI is the closest of them. It is said to be pure primordial
matter, and as such can only offer ATMA its purity as a
reflection base, so to say. Thereafter (?) comes the MIND --
MANAS, and so on down the line.

Compris?

Dal

=======================

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Stubbs [mailto:stevestubbs@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:38 AM
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Theos-World Logic - to Peter

JERRY: Dallas has flatly stated many
> many times that atma-buddhi
> IS a monad, and thus demonstrates that he doesn't
> know what a monad really
> is. Its supposed to be the very opposite of an
> aggregate

I wonder if anyone understands that these distinctions
exist only in consciousness and not in reality. In
reality there is no atma or buddhi as separate
entities, and therefore no compromising the essential
unity of it.