Theos-Talk Archives (November 2001 Message tt00598)

Dear Steve and Govert,

Just a quickie as short of time. I think what you have both said is
probably two of the best things stated so far on this topic, and I include
what I have written in the "so far".

Thanks and 'blessings',

...Peter

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Govert Schuller [mailto:schuller@alpheus.org]
> Sent: 30 November 2001 19:46
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Logic - to Peter
>
>
> STEVE: I wonder if anyone understands that these distinctions
> exist only in consciousness and not in reality. In
> reality there is no atma or buddhi as separate
> entities, and therefore no compromising the essential
> unity of it.
>
> GOVERT: Just to throw in a little phenomenology. Consciousness is
> nothing if
> not conscious OF something, and reality is nothing if there is no
> consciousness OF it. And there can be unity, eventhough there might be
> internal differentiation. So, Atma-Buddhi might well be a unitary state of
> blissful consciousness of being as a differentiation within the unity of
> Brahman.
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>