Theos-Talk Archives (August 2001 Message tt00132)

Leon:
What accusations? That reference was only used as a metaphorical example --
since it is well known that Hitler was a student of occultism before he
wrote Mein Kampf, and that he twisted the teachings in the Secret Doctrine
(which,
there is evidence he studied while a student in Munich) with reference to
the Aryans as well as the Hebrews, to justify much of his nazi "master Race"
philosophy, as well as the extermination of the Jews.


Frank:
I simply ignore your comments on my character which I snipped as that stuff
is not of my interest. Sometimes I am puzzled with your emails.
Your new assertions about Hitler and HPB are pure nonsense. What kind of
books are you reading? Obviously you are a true believer of your Hollywood
and establishment propaganda (I mention only the lies in the recent Pearl
Harbour movie). Note that I am not a Nazi (aside from the definition of the
"liberals", gays, Jews, Communists and work-shy people who accuse others as
Nazi even if he/she is a Vegetarian or drinks no or too few alcohol) or a
spokesmen of them, but fact is:

(1) In the serious historical research there is not a single proof or even a
hint that Hitler was interested in occultism and there is no single hint
that he knew about the existence of HPB's book, nor that he ever read it.
Read the major reseachers like Fest or Maser who clearly say that all this
phantasies of creative writers have no reality. OTOH, there are many
quotations from Hitler that he believed in God, read the bible and condemned
basic theosophical teachings like karma and reincarnation. Why then is
Hitler known to quote frequently in his lectures (which he wrote for
himself) from the bible and not in a single instance from the SD or any
other common occult book?

(2) Most books about Hitler are tales from creative writers and have no
truth in it. Sources like Hermann Rauschning, the so-called "Anne Frank
diaries", Trevor-Roper, Ravenscroft, Henry Picker, Pauwels/Bergier, Dietrich
Bronder etc. etc. are regarded and proofed by serious historians (and not
only by revisionist historians) as nonsense. From this imaginary stories
(for which never sources were given and for which are no sources in
existence) hundreds other creative writers were writing off.

(3) There is no source proofing that Hitler wanted to exterminate the
Jews, therefor he could not have used the SD as justification.

(4) It is obvious that the churches are furious that Theosophy still exists
and as they have learned that the old slanders of forgery on HPB didn't work
anyone they invented in collaboration with the left politicians the racism
slanders as the priesthood denounces everyone who believes in evolution and
not in God's creation.
As it turns out now that at least in Germany not many in this untrue and
silly propaganda they have a new pet accusation which is that the
Theosophists are satanists because they speak friendly about Lucifer. It is
for sure that for intelligent people both the old and the new chuzpee
slanders will
not work.

(5) It is sad that Theosophists support and take over this transparent
maneuver without necessity and inquiry.
If you contradict the above then please show your sources and we go on.