ENQ. Which system do you prefer or follow, in that case, besides Buddhistic
ethics?
THEO. None, and all. We hold to no religion, as to no philosophy in
particular: we cull the good we find in each. But here, again, it must be
stated that, like all other ancient systems, Theosophy is divided into
Exoteric and Esoteric Sections.
ENQ. What is the difference?
THEO. The members of the Theosophical Society at large are free to profess
whatever religion or philosophy they like, or none if they so prefer,
provided they are in sympathy with, and ready to carry out one or more of the
three objects of the Association. The Society is a philanthropic and
scientific body for the propagation of the idea of brotherhood on practical
instead of theoretical lines. The Fellows may be Christians or Mussulmen,
Jews or Parsees, Buddhists or Brahmins, Spiritualists or Materialists, it
does not matter; but every member must be either a philanthropist, or a
scholar, a searcher into Aryan and other old literature, or a psychic
student. In short, he has to help, if he can, in the carrying out of at least
one of the objects of the programme. Otherwise he has no reason for becoming
a "Fellow." Such are the majority of the exoteric Society, composed of
"attached" and "unattached" members. [An "attached member" means one who has
joined some particular branch of the T. S. An "unattached," one who belongs
to the Society at large, has his diploma, from the Headquarters (Adyar,
Madras), but is connected with no branch or lodge.] These may, or may not,
become theosophists de facto. Members they are, by virtue of their having
joined the Society; but the latter cannot make a theosophist of one who has
no sense for the divine fitness of things, or of him who understands
Theosophy in his own — if the expression may be used — sectarian and
egotistic way. "Handsome is, as handsome does" could be paraphrased in this
case and be made to run: "Theosophist is, who Theosophy does."
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
