Theos-Talk Archives (July 2001 Message tt00351)

Daniel:
"What the U.L.T. is trying to do is to perpetuate for
future students copies of the ORIGINAL texts upon
which THEOSOPHY is based." These are YOUR caps,
Dallas.

Although this may be partially true it is NOT totally
true. Dallas, can you tell me and other interested
persons WHY the ULT is NOT trying to perpetuate for
future students copies of the ORIGINAL text of HPB's
1889 VOICE OF THE SILENCE?

Why is the ULT not perpetuating for future students
copies of the ORIGINAL text of many of HPB's articles
found only in a multilated form in the ULT reprint of
MODERN PANARION?

Furthermore, why is the ULT not perpetuating for
future students copies of the ORIGINAL text of some
500 + articles from HPB's pen which are not to be
found in the ULT 3 volume set titled THEOSOPHICAL
ARTICLES?

Dallas, I am really puzzled by these kind of
inconsistent statements sprinkled throughout your
emails.

Frank:
O Daniel, you should better read the DECLARATION of the ULT, were you can
find that the ULT deals only with the original texts of HPB and Judge. So,
please, what is your problem? :-))
You say that ULT doesn't reprint verbatim et literatim, but the declaration
shows that they do. If they would not reprint verbatim they would not
declare it and they declare it they are verbatim.

Remember:
We believe only, what we know.
But we know only, what we believe.
What we would not like to know,
we would also not like to believe.
And that what we know
will no one believe.

Or say it with the Beach Boys: Don't worry, Baby!