Theos-Talk Archives (July 2001 Message tt00103)

>to THEOSOPHY (I mean the ORIGINAL TEACHINGS). There is no room
>for any kind of politics, and those who work, select their own
>tasks and provide their own energy, funds and devotion. The
>U.L.T. , in brief, advances PRINCIPLES for observation, and not
>the passing opinions of PERSONS.

Dallas, when I join now the ULT then I am free and can select my own task as
you say, don't?
Can I then write up an article on a subject of my own and let it then
publish in the ULT magazine?
Or is there someone within the ULT who has selected as his own task to
prevent my article?
If that is possible I join just today the ULT.
If not so, who decides, what are the original teachings?

>2. To provide students, inquirers, anybody with a forum for
>study and mutual consultation on the meaning of those "original
>teachings."

As I cannot see any discussions or presentation of different ideas in the
ULT magazines one can only come to the conclusion that the ULT either
a) has a secret dictatorship or
b) consists only of high developed adepts who know all.

Furthermore I wonder why you bother the readers every week with your ULT
Declaration. A group which has a need for such silly commercials cannot be
very theosophical. And esoterically speaking it counts for nothing what the
ULT writes on the paper. I am more interested in that how it is lived. When
I say in Cuba and China is no freedom and you present me every week
their constitution where human rights are praised it would count for nothig
to me.

Fact is that in the mailing lists which are managed by ULT agents there is
censorship and books from the Theosophy Publishing Co. are here and then
faked.
Frank