Theos-Talk Archives (February 2001 Message tt00200)

I would say that if we know what H.P.B. says specifically, we
ought first check it out for reasonableness, common sense and
general plausibility

Then,

We ought to compare what H.P.B. originally wrote with any
comments or expressions about WHAT SHE WROTE -- to see if they
are accurate and helpful.

If they are not then inquire of the authors for an explanation.

You can get in pretty deep in such things.

Have fun.

Dal

============================

-----Original Message-----
From: sanctius@mail.com [mailto:sanctius@mail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 8:36 AM
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Theos-World Pseudosophy

"Blavatsky Net defines Theosophy as 'what Madame Blavatsky
wrote'".
- www.blavastky.net

Therefore Blavatsky Net states that anything that Madame
Blavastky did
NOT write, is NOT theosophy. Madame Blavasky herself NEVER stated
anything like that. She never claimed that theosophy, or
Theosophy, or
THEOSOPHY to be only that what she wrote. So did not claim Judge
or
Olcott. After her death, other people began to say that THEOSOPHY
is
that what Blavasky has written. Whom to believe?

It might be more correct to say, that Madame Blavatsky did write
a
great deal of theosophy. And there were a lot of theosophical
information in her writings. And She herself was a drop of
theosophy
in the ocean of eternal wisdom, as were the adepts who poured
their
drops thru Blavastky to us. You and me are also little drops of
theosophy. Let us join and share our drops into a larger drop, so
the
adepts may pour their water of wisdom through us all and for all.

--
http://www.kolumbus.fi/sanctius/myself.html




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/