Theos-Talk Archives (November 2000 Message tt00226)

Or perhaps we just need to give up the false notion of "my" in "my space".

If its my space is it "limitless ever-present SPACE"?

...Peter

>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eugene Carpenter [mailto:Ecarpent@co.la.ca.us]
> Sent: 21 November 2000 18:04
> To: theos-talk@egroups.com
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Space
>
>
> Ah yes oh wise-one-playing-the-fool. Perhaps the buddhic concept of
> Non-obstruction might be a useful consideration here.
>
> Sunyata
> Pinyata
> yata yata yata
>
> Gene(yata)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Drpsionic@aol.com>
> To: <theos-talk@egroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 8:03 AM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Space
>
>
> > In a message dated 11/21/00 9:52:30 AM Central Standard Time,
> > Ecarpent@co.la.ca.us writes:
> >
> > <<
> > Wouldn't it be cool if scientists dicovered that what we call matter is
> > simply a misunderstanding and the universe is one hundred percent pure
> space.
> > >>
> >
> > But then we have the problem of what happens when my space tries to walk
> > through the space of a wall when I miss the space of the door.
> >
> > Chuck the Heretic
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>