[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Jun 06, 2000 07:35 PM
by Bart Lidofsky
MorganArts@aol.com wrote: > Thank you for clarifying the First Proposition of the Fundamentals. Actually, I didn't; I merely corrected a typo on your part. > However, I do think that a blanket statement about a group of > people albeit prefaced with "probably" is not a way to the path of > truth. Note that one can speak in generalities about a group; it is when one talks about the individuals that we cannot necessarily associate the characteristics of the group to the individual. For example, I would dare say that you are against racial profiling, but you also probably make sure your car doors are locked when going through a high-crime minority neighborhood (on the other hand, if you are going though a middle or upper-class minority neighborhood, you probably don't). It is not that you think that any given individual may try to commit a crime against you; you just know that there is a higher probability that SOMEBODY is going to do something. This is not to say that Leon's assessment was correct, it is to say that it is not necessarily violating the principle of Universal Brotherhood. Bart Lidofsky -- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.