Theos-Talk Archives (June 2000 Message tt00005)

In a message dated 05/31/00 10:56:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
blafoun@azstarnet.com writes:

<< My questions to Todd Lorentz and all other readers of this email are:
 
 Do you believe that there are such "garbled" and "distorted" presentations
 of Theosophy?
 
 If so, can you give any examples of such "charlatanesque imitations" in the
 last 109 years?
  >>

Hello Daniel,

I think that anyone who has been around any TS group for a while, would not 
have a problem finding out about Theosophical Charlatans. However, your 
questions provoked an even more important question from my point of view. 

Does anyone associated with ULT or other fundamentalist theosophical groups 
think that there is any valid theosophy outside of HPB's or Judge's 
teachings. Has anything come along in the last 109 years that can be 
considered acceptable? If so can examples be given? Are we indeed frozen in 
time, confined only to the study of the founders? Can it be that the works of 
HPB et al. which in some regards can be considered the definitive treatise on 
the subject of pervasive evolution, does not itself evolve? 

Louis

-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com

Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.