Theos-Talk Archives (May 2000 Message tt00164)

> From "Kim Poulsen" kpoulsen@vip.cybercity.dk ----
The 3 "critical essays" mentioned, are not worth bothering with, not so much 
due to their unpleasant spirit pervading them, as to the absence of analytic 
capacity demonstrated by the authors. The criticism amounts apparently to 
finding words in the works of AAB, which are uncommon in HPB's works. etc 
etc etc etc etc

And furthermore completely alien the freedom of spirit and freedom of 
investigation which is the very essence of theosophy.


To Kim Poulsen ----

I don't know alot about Mrs Bailey but your words show you want to avoid 
discussing substance of these essays.  Authors of essays are concerned with 
dissimilarity  between ideas & teachings in Mrs Blavatsky's writings & those 
in Mrs Bailey's books.  Mr Weeks pointed to contradictions that you ignore.

Also address Mrs Bailey's anti-Jewish remarks.  I find "unpleasant spirit 
pervading" Mrs Bailey's words. Aren't you ashamed to defend Alice Bailey's 
ugly words?  Or do you agree with these anti-Jewish comments?

Are you denying to these authors the "freedom of investigation" you claim is 
essence of theosophy?

David




________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com

Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.