Theos-Talk Archives (February 2000 Message tt00021)

Several persons have requested copies of my follow-up
reply to K. Paul Johnson's Rebuttal Remarks to my
"House of Cards" critique on Johnson's thesis about the
Theosophical Mahatmas.

My follow-up reply (which is now slightly revised
and updated) is on the WWW at:

http://sites.netscape.net/dhcblainfo/johnsonparanormal.htm

Methinks Johnson Has "Shot" Himself in the "Foot":  
Daniel H. Caldwell Replies to Some of K. Paul Johnson's Rebuttal Remarks 

This paper is divided into two parts:

> Part I 
> Johnson's "Definition" of the Paranormal and Its Bearing 
> on Henry S. Olcott's Accounts of the Theosophical Masters 
> 
> Part II 
> The Fallacy in Another Johnsonian Argument 


The above is also available thru Blavatsky Net at:

http://www.blavatsky.net/gen/refute/caldwell/johnson.htm 

> K. PAUL JOHNSON'S HOUSE OF CARDS?:
> A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF JOHNSON'S THESIS ON 
> THE THEOSOPHICAL MASTERS MORYA AND KOOT HOOMI
> 
> by Daniel H. Caldwell



-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com

Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.