Theos-World RE: theos-l digest: November 14, 1999
Nov 15, 1999 04:57 PM
by W. Dallas TenBroeck
Nov 15th 1999
Many thanks for review of Kant-ism I found him most interesting,
and perhaps read more into his writing than he meant ? -- but
then, I also think he made some good and some (partially good)
points -- but don't we all? I think that exchanges of this
nature make us all more generous to each other.
Some NOTES below
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 1999 10:44 PM
To: Theosophy Study List
Subject: Re: theos-l digest: November 14, 1999
>Pure thinking (Kant) is what is wanted. All factors out in
Interesting, since I always viewed the core of Kant as being
"anti-theosophical." Kant argues that we must assume that nature
ordered in such a way that is purposeful, which thereby
forces someone, to approach the study of nature as being formed
intelligent creator. Such mental "lock-down" seems unacceptable
DTB Agreed -- let's look at him without the "creator" concept (if
Also, his famous categorical imperative, which he claims is based
reason, has been proven over and over again to fail Kant's
much for reason as the sole standard for moral knowledge.
And, for you, Dallas, in your pursuit of knowledge of noumena -
these things can be pondered upon, but never really known. So,
it is a subtle suggestion that our questions of "what is human"
an exercise in chasing our tails.
DTB Possibly, as to the real source of all things -- I mean the
non-manifest ABSOLUTENESS (to use a Theosophical idea) but, what
have we got that is an absolutely sure thing? To me, we have 3:
1. - I know I exist.
2. - You and the rest of the universe "out there" also exist.
3. - We have on-going relationships of many kinds. Consequently
we are able to investigate those relationships.
Putting it metaphysically (if allowed), Spirit has for opposition
Matter. All wisdom vs. ignorance and inexperience. Potential vs.
limits of form.
The 3rd factor: Perception -- Mind. Intermediate between Spirit
& Matter -- and in its purity would be unaffected by either,
hence capable of "perceiving" them and all their many kinds of
[ Example: mental attitude of a Scientist in his lab, seeking in
some aspect of Nature, for the laws that rule its being.]
Side note: The philosopher P.F. Strawson, in his book
intriguingly makes Kant into an empiricist - Kant would not be
pleased - but
Strawson does an admirable job.
DTB I haven't read him. My loss I guess. so far.
Basically, in my opinion, there is no evidence that Kant really
On a more personal level, Kant's approach to thinking so carried
his personal life that he ended up needing such a rigidity to his
routine, that it interfered with his ability to truly connect
around him. He began to treat people like objects. Another
example of how
the dominance of "reason" in one's life can distort what it means
to be a
DTB Probably an exaggeration -- which is unable to bend with the
current of other aspects of life and living. All should be
balanced. But any over-emphasis leads to some exaggeration and
that ought to be identified so that the one who is in an
exaggerated mode (if they are willing to listen to another's
view) may readjust themselves.
What I ken is that we are all multifaceted, and we need to be
able to apprehend and use all those faculties so that the real
human being is generous (my term) to others.
You are currently subscribed to theos-l as: DALVAL@NWC.NET
List URL - http://list.vnet.net/?enter=theos-l
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- firstname.lastname@example.org
Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to email@example.com.
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application