Theos-Talk Archives (February 1999 Message tt00009)

Bart

In a message dated 1/27/99 3:23:23 AM, bartl@sprynet.com writes:

>LeonMaurer@aol.com wrote:
>> 
>> Here's a contribution to the study of consciousness that may serve to
>> open up some new lines of inquiry.
>> 
>> According to Malcolm Brown in a New York Times article (Tuesday, July 22,
>> 1997), Dr. Nicolas Gisin of the University of Geneva in a recent experiment
>> has demonstrated that paired particles at a great distance apart are in
>> communication with each other and make identical decisions instantaneously
>> when faced with a similar choice.  This implies that the communication
>> between the particles traveled faster than the speed of light.  
>
> There are other explanations.

Yes, but, there is only ONE correct explanation.  As an analogous example;
When a modulated electromagnetic field of one "carrier" frequency transfers
its modulations (by induction) to a coadunate field of another carrier
frequency, the induced modulations in the second field appear instantaneously.
Therefore the apparent time of the exchange of information from one field to
the other would appear to be far faster than the speed of light.  Actually, in
the case of the split particles, there wouldn't actually be any choice, since
the change of direction or momentum would be governed by the change induced by
one particle (the sender) by a common field distortion--since both split
particles (actually a split wave front) would be linked to each other as well
as to the initiating particle through their common, non local zero-point-
instant.  i.e., In the quantum particle case described by Gisin, the split
photon particles, traveling though the non local zero-point fields would be
coadunate with their zero-point-instant of origin and, therefore, would react
instantaneously upon transmission of change information (a distortion of their
common field pertaining to velocity or direction of motion) from one split
particle to the other.  This, in effect, would appear to be instantaneous
"action at a distance" (which occurs far quicker than light could travel the
smallest measurable distance between the particles).  

Essentially, this information would be transferred through the higher
dimensional (higher frequency order) zero-point fields.  This implies that the
zero-point (astral, mental, consciousness) field vibrations, at their natural
frequencies, are far faster by many orders than the highest energy
electromagnetic waves, with their corresponding "time" constants shortened
accordingly--and, thereby, can propagate far faster than the speed of sidereal
light.  Because all fields originate from and are harmonics of one primal
field--that original field must be vibrating at a frequency close to
infinite--since it originates out of fundamental abstract spin in the primal
"emptiness" prior to the first manifestation of the Logos.  Therefore, the
fields of consciousness (or spirit) would have far higher frequencies and
shorter time constants, than the fields of matter.

But such a "neo-physics" viewpoint, based solely on field laws (cycles) rather
than particle laws, may yet be far over the heads of most contemporary
physicists (let alone non scientifically minded theosophists:-)... But,
nevertheless, it's perfectly consistent with the theosophical teachings
pertaining to fundamental principles, states of consciousness, seven fold
nature, psychic powers, unity of all fields, etc.  (See: Universal Energy
Field Diagram at: 
<A HREF="http://members.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield
.html">
http://members.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html</A>
) 
I suspect, it won't be long before the geo-mathematical as well as subjective
"proofs" of the ABC field theory will become so evident, that science will
jump on the bandwagon and claim they knew it all the time.  But, as they are
the gurus of this age, their acceptance and acknowledgment that such higher
energy fields exist, could eventually serve to swing theosophy back into the
mainstream of popular thought and, hopefully, action.
>
>> However, the experiment may have proven much more than is apparent at
>>first glance.  Here is one analysis of the results that may possibly lead us
>> to a new theory of consciousness as well as to a further understanding of
>>the mechanisms of conscious awareness (that is partially explained by my
>> ABC* theory) and may add a new wrinkle linking classical physics with 
>> quantum mechanics.
>
>	Actually, not with the current scientific paradigm. The current
>scientific paradigm requires the removal, as far as is possible, from
>the factor of consciousness entering any experiment, which more or less
>guarantees that scientists will never find it.

Correct.  But, I am speaking of an entirely new paradigm.  And, we're almost
there--even though established "Science" doesn't quite know it yet. (Although
some scientists working in sub-quantum field theories are getting pretty
close.)  Currently, "new" post-guantum theoretical physics, or as I call it,
"sub-quantum physics"--particularly quantum cosmology and its "Super String"
and "M-brane" theories dealing with 11 dimensions and zero=point energy fields
("perturbations of the Vacuum"), along with new theories of "quantum
fields"--opens the door to eventually mathematically linking the frequencies,
wave lengths, octaves, etc. of the "zero-point energy" fields (containing
higher mind-memory-consciousness) with the lower "matter-energy" quantum
fields--through the intermediate astral fields. 

How this is to be proven is quite a problem--but not insurmountable once
science realizes that, in Nature, all 3-dimensional holographic, or any analog
image information, must be transferred from one field to another by means of
the wave laws rather than the particular particle (quantum) laws prevailing in
any given field-frequency order or field phase.  This realization (which I
think the scientists working on chaos, simplicity and complexity theories
already have some inkling of) will take us to the next step of examining these
intermediate fields, both subjectively and objectively, and explaining their
source, interrelationships, and transform characteristics--by using timeframe
animated 3-D computer graphics image (CGI) transformational analysis (which I
am currently working on).  

Eventually Science will have to accept this new sub-quantum coenergetic field
paradigm, and jump off from the now classical quantum world--as the earlier
classicists did when modern theories of relativity, and indeterminacy came
along--and focus on the fields and the waves rather than the particles.  (i.e.
"keep their eye in the hole and not on the donut," so to speak:-)  (How else
will we someday invent the "Holodeck", the "Phaser", and the "Real McCoy"
healing wand?:) :) ;)
>	
>	In any case, the current popular explanation is that when action is
>taken against the first particle, another is created moving backwards in
>time, back to the creation of the two particles, and that is what causes
>the 2nd particle to change.

The "popular" explanation, like all of contemporary physicalist (or should I
say materialist?) Science, tells only part of the story.  They forget that
time, as a "measure of change," occurs only on the level of "fields" imbued
with constantly changing image patterns and wave propagation times.  Negative
time is just a mathematical artifact of quantum physics to explain the
particle mechanics of what essentially is the propagation of a wave as it
returns from a reflective surface and creates interference patterns that
holographically image the exact point of origination.  Much like the circular
waves that expand from a dropped stone in water and reflect back from the
shore.  When the outgoing wave meets the incoming wave, the directional
information carried by both waves merge, form an "interference pattern" that
can holographical reconstruct and locate the "image" of the origin point.
Sure, it takes time (depending on the time constant of the particular field)
for energy waves to travel, but when differently sourced waves meet and form
an interference pattern, the information carried by one wave field is
transferred instantly to the other.  According to the ABC field theories now
proposed, there is no actual moving backwards in time.  What they are seeing
on the physical plane is actually just the shortening of the time constant in
each successive higher frequency order of the ascending "coenergetic" zero-
point "consciousness" fields.

Hope all this clears the air a bit, (if it doesn't bog us down in the mud made
of  holistic thought waves crashing against masses of clumped up brain
particles.:-) 

Best wishes,

LHM


>
>	

-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com

Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.