Theos-Talk Archives (November 1998 Message tt00462)

Richard,

In your email below you use the phrase
"preternaturally indefectable".  Before
I comment, would you please define and
elucidate what this means to you especially
as it would relate to HPB and the Masters.

Daniel


RIhle@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/24/98 10:28:44 PM Central Standard Time,
> blafoun@azstarnet.com writes:
>
> << Richard wrote:
>
>  > On the other hand, there may be many others besides me who have never been
>  > shown to any satisfaction at all why they should discard Jerry's views just
> in
>  > order to fully adopt your view of Blavatsky and the "adepts."
>
>  Daniel replies:
>
>  Richard, you write about MY view, ie. "your view of Blavatsky and the
>  'adepts'."  Whatever "my view" may or may not be, I was writing about
>  *the view of Blavatsky and the adepts* as found in their writings. >>
>
> Daniel, the problem may have two parts:  1) sometimes it may be a disagreement
> between you and Jerry about what ~actually was~ HPB's view, and 2) sometimes
> it may be that your view of regarding Blavatsky and the "adepts" as
> preternaturally indefectable automatically makes anything Jerry deviates from,
> even slightly, wrong--dead wrong.  I don't like #2.
>
> Godspeed,
> Richard Ihle
>
>