Theos-Talk Archives (November 1998 Message tt00439)

Daniel wrote:

> << Jerry has every right to disagree with this view.  But so far
>  on Theos-l and Theos-talk he has never shown to my satisfaction why one
>  should discard the view of Blavatsky and the adepts and adopt his
>  view. >>

Richard wrote:

> On the other hand, there may be many others besides me who have never been
> shown to any satisfaction at all why they should discard Jerry's views just in
> order to fully adopt your view of Blavatsky and the "adepts."

Daniel replies:

Richard, you write about MY view, ie. "your view of Blavatsky and the
'adepts'."  Whatever "my view" may or may not be, I was writing about
*the view of Blavatsky and the adepts* as found in their writings.  One
can ascertain what the view of Blavatsky and her adepts are *on this
topic under discussion*. But it is a totally *separate issue* whether
one agrees or not with their view.  Jerry apparently has a contrary
view.  I simply stated I have never been told the good reasons, details,
etc. that would reasonably persuade me to discard Blavatsky's/KH's view
and adopt Jerry's view.