Theos-Talk Archives (November 1998 Message tt00416)

>Essentially, what you speak of is our "higher consciousness" which,
although
>we cannot objectively "measure" its constituents, we nevertheless can
>experience its causal effects.  Therefore, it must, as HPB has pointed out,
>"exist" in some "spiritualized" form or another, capable of interfacing
with
>and affecting the lower mental and physical fields--possibly as a vibratory
>field, in itself, that is of a higher order of frequency than the
>electromagnetic fields we can measure, and even higher than the
astral-mental
>fields that are also beyond the scope of detection by our ordinary sensory
or
>physical instruments.
>

This is, I believe, pure assumption. There is no way for us to know of
spirit's "causal effects" and I am not at all sure there any such thing
exists.
The idea that we can experience spirit's causal effects is an unprovable
assumption. It may or may not be a true one. However, you seem to have
missed the idea that higher consciousness can, and has, been
experienced by people throughout history. Rather than trying to
experience the effects of something (which may not even exist as such)
wouldn't it be better to experience that something directly and then
draw your own conclusions from those experiences?

Jerry S.