Theos-Talk Archives (September 1998 Message tt00013)

Dallas,
You and other readers might be interested in Michael Cremo's
follow up book:

Forbidden Archeology's Impact
by Michael A. Cremo

Hardcover - 544 pages (July 1998)

Synopsis
When Cremo's book "Forbidden Archaeology" was published in 1993,
thescientific world was shocked by its extensive evidence for extreme
human antiquity--pushing the origin of thehuman race back tens of
millions of years. "Forbidden Archeology's Impact" documents the
explosive reactions to his controversial book.

Go to Amazon.com at:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0892132833/o/qid=904789435/sr=2-2/002-6758777-1671659

Daniel



W. Dallas TenBroeck wrote:
>
> Sept 2nd 1998
>
> Dear Andrew::
>
> Further to my posting to you of Aug 28th 1998.  I secured the information
> concerning the reference book that seemed so valuable to me on this subject.
>
> FORBIDDEN ARCHAEOLOGY
> -The Hidden History of the Human Race
>
> by      Michael A Cremo  and  Richard L. Thompson
>
> Publisher::     Bhaktivedanta Institute
>                 P. O. Box 99584,
>                 San Diego,, Ca., 99584
>
> Issued:         1993
>
> I went through this tome (1800 pages)  These are Post-graduate students in
> archaeology.  They discovered that many museums and departments of
> archaeology at several Universities concealed artifacts.  If they had been
> carefully considered and reported on when found, they would tend to break
> down the accepted views on the history of human development as revealed
> through fossils, etc.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Dallas
>
> From: W. Dallas TenBroeck
> Sent:   Friday, August 28, 1998 4:49 AM
> Subject: Re: Giants - again == THE 3RD. ROUND "MATTER" - astral and tenuous
>
> Aug 28th 1998
>
> Dear Andrew:
>
> I will shortly send you details about the book I mentioned, published in San
> Diego.
>
> I recall seeing in a copy of the national Geographic magazine some years ago
> photographs taken in Utah in the areas where so many fossilized skeletons of
> dinosaurs, etc are found, of human appearing footprints which were very
> large in size.  some of them overlapped the prints of the dinosaurs, as
> though they were contemporary imprints in the same "mud" that became
> fossilized.  It was a mystery, but the theory advanced was that the mud had
> become liquefied at some far later date in order to have human footprints
> overlapping -- but the theory did not explain how or why they were so huge.
>
> In the SD there are references to an early Round (the 3rd) when all matter
> was "astral" and when the forms were much larger, so that animal man and
> animal dinosaur were of a comparable size.  It is also suggested that the
> "astral fossils" have been "materialized" so as to leave their imprint in
> our present (4th Round) matter just as a reflection or impression of that
> which was made in the original "astral matter."    [ see SD  II 68fn, 684,
> 730, 149, 277, 285, 196-7. 686fn, 208, 217-8,  ]
>
> As I understand the S D, and its view of the history of evolution on our
> World, the earlier Rounds ( 1, 2, 3, saw "matter" of a far more tenuous kind
> than that we know of at present -- perhaps the space between the nucleus and
> the electrons was a wider one ? -- but that may be a very "materialistic"
> speculation)
>
> The SD calls that matter of the 3rd Round "astral" -- and if we apply the
> law of analogy it is now interior to our "physical matter" and forms the
> lattice work, the electro-magnetic mold or pattern on which the physical
> molecules arrange themselves.  [ see HPB article:  "PSYCHIC AND NOETIC
> ACTION" ]
>
> Hope this is of further help.
>
> Dallas.
>
> > From: "Andrew Rooke" <andrew@mmclib.med.monash.edu.au>
> > Date: Friday, August 28, 1998 12:50 AM
> > Subject: Giants - again
>
> >Many thanks Dallas for your time and trouble in answering my query re-
> >recent discoveries of the remains of giants. So often in theosophical
> >discussion it happens that we seem to be relying on "ancient"
> >evidence when this is not credible to many enquirers. Eg. if bones of
> >giants were exposed in earthquakes etc and recorded by chroniclers of
> >the ancient world, why don't we have the evidence from modern
> >systematic investigation, from a much larger population where the
> >earth's land area is more settled and monitored than in ancient days.
> >Perhaps the answer lies in the book you mentioned published in San
> >Diego last year regarding scientific cover-ups. I would be glad to
> >know the details of this book, though one can't help thinking that if
> >anybody discovered the bones of a giant human they would be certain
> >to advertise the fact as they would be certain to obtain a grant for
> >extra scientific investigation!
> >
> >Have you seen the excellent article by Bill Savage in the Theosophic
> >Link 8:3 (also on the WWW at the American Section TS (Pasadena) site)
> >coordinating HPB's chronology of the ancient history of the human
> >race and modern scientific timelines? He mentions the possibility
> >that self-conscious humanity and dinosaurs may have coexisted for a
> >while. To me it seems the enormous interest in movies like Jurassic
> >Park and Godzilla bespeak of some deeply rooted shared memories of
> >these creatures in the human psyche.
> >
> >Thankyou also for your comments on the antiquity of some buildings in
> >ancient Egypt and the material by Charles Fort and Veikovsky. Gives
> >me plenty to think about and points to the value of the Internet as a
> >medium for sharing perspectives across the oceans.
> >
> >All the best,
> >
> >Andrew Rooke - Melbourne, Australia
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>