Theos-Talk Archives (August 1998 Message tt00123)

>For myself I have written a review of one of PJ's books and spent enough
>of my few little grey cells in writing about his concepts.  My view is
>that Paul Johnson does not (perhaps cannot) understand Theosophy or HPB.
>There are many, many people who, like Paul, do not accept HPB on her own
>terms -- probably the majority of those who have pondered on her and her
>Theosophy.
>

This reply is terribly elitist (I know HPB but you don't!!) and says more
about
the author than about Theosophy. HPB never required anyone to accept
her "on her own terms" (whatever that means).


>At this point I am willing to point out to those new to HPB or Theosophy,
>that I think PJ is wrong headed on these topics and suggest people study
>HPB and her Gurus writings first -- and if they wish to save time and
>confusion, ignore PJ's writings.
>

This is your own opinion and subjective conclusion based on your
current worldview. You are perfectly entitled to it. I, on the other hand,
feel quite differently. I have deep respect for HPB and her works and
somehow still was able to enjoy and appreciate Johnson's book,
which made her and her Adepts out ot be very human.


>At some time in one's life you have to ponder on values to choose, then
>choose, then act on those values chosen.
>

I would like to think that we all do this.


>I still occasionally will debate, but I try to focus on questions and
>puzzlements from new students and not spend much time on beating dead
>squirrels.
>


Debate is OK, as long as it doesn't get too personal. There is
no more wrong with your hating Paul's books than there is
with me liking them. HPB, like all of us human beings, is
multi-faceted and can be viewed from many angles.

Jerry S.