"Conscious II"
Aug 08, 1998 03:52 PM
by Jake Jaqua
>Tony writes:
>>"No conscious sex-action of any kind"? Why put in
>>"conscious"?
>>Wouldn't an unconscious sex-action be the same?
>>Masters are conscious 24 hours per day? To what
>>extent would lanoos, or
>>even chelas be tending in this direction?
>>Tony
--------------------------------------------------
> I put in "conscious" to exclude onanism, which
>many think is still "celibacy." And yes, you're right the
>direction is to being able to control your dreams also.
> - Jake J.
=====================================
That didn't make a dam bit of sense did it? I used "no
conscious sex action of any kind" to exclude masturbation, but not to
included wet-dreams (which people generally don't have much control over
until and when they can control their dreams.) So in other words -
Celibacy is no wacking off, no women (or men in women's case), but don't
worry much about the wet-dreams. Is that plain enough??
- Jake J.
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application