theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: "Conscious"

Aug 08, 1998 10:55 AM
by Bart Lidofsky


jakej@henry-net.com wrote:
> Tony writes:
> >"No conscious sex-action of any kind"?  Why put in
> >"conscious"?
> >Wouldn't an unconscious sex-action be the same?
>
> >Masters are conscious 24 hours per day?  To what
> >extent would lanoos, or
> >even chelas be tending in this direction?
>          I put in "conscious" to exclude onanism, which
> many think is still "celibacy."  And yes, you're right the
> direction is to being able to control your dreams also.
(Quotes edited solely to remove excess blank lines and signatures)

	Note that the even the Adepts are not Adepts 24 hours a day (I forget
where it says this in the Mahatma Letters, and am too lazy to look it up
right now). It is also at least implied in the Mahatma Letters that in
order to remain in physical human form, they must generate a certain
amount of personal karma (probably why Moria had a pipe, for example).

	Bart Lidofsky




[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application