Theos-Talk Archives (May 1998 Message tt00497)

What reviling?  I don't see any reviling of HPB's teachings at all!  I see
a lot of respect for her teachings from both Paul and Jerry.  I also see
serious enquiring minds not blindly swallowing everything that is offered
them.  They wouldn't be students of theosophy if they reviled HPB's
teachings.  They also wouldn't be students of theosophy if they did not use
their judgment.  What's the big deal about these "untruths?"  With the body
of work that HPB put out, these are just crumbs.

Thoa :o)


>"The foolish man reviles the teachings of the holy ones, the noble and
>the virtuous; he follows flase doctrines which bear fruit to his own
>destruction, even like the fruit of the Katthaka reed."
>
>> From: "Daniel H Caldwell" <blafoun@azstarnet.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 1998 3:47 PM
>> Subject: A New Web Site: Blavatsky's Alleged "Untruths"
>>
>> ANNOUNCING A NEW WEB SITE AT
>>
>> http://www.azstarnet.com/~blafoun/untruths.htm
>>
>> BLAVATSKY'S ALLEGED "UNTRUTHS"
>> There is no religion, belief or opinion higher than the truth.
>>
>> A number of Theosophical students as well as other individuals have
>> claimed that H.P. Blavatsky made various statements
>> which could be called "untruths".  K. Paul Johnson in his various
>> books
<snip>