Re: SD 3rd Edition
May 23, 1998 05:32 PM
by Dr A M Bain
W. Dallas TenBroeck <email@example.com> writes
>RE: 3rd & Revised Edition SECRET DOCTRINE
>In a separate posting today I see that Daniel Caldwell has placed
>for our reading the opinions of several of those who years ago
>reviewed and compared the "3rd & Revised S D" with the Original S
>D of 1888.
So he has, but they are opinions which I am sure can be set against
alternative opinions. What I am interested to see is WHERE and HOW
in the SECRET DOCTRINE the changes have been made, and ideally
compared with each other for modern students to make their own
assessments. Like maybe quotes from BOTH editions where the later
contradicts of changes the meaning of the former. This is claimed, but
no examples are offered. Please offer some, and offer them in context.
>There is no question but each will frame their own opinions and
>go on accordingly.
Based upon witers opinions who do not, hoever, give clear and
concrete example? I think not.
>Best wishes, Dallas.
And to you also!
Brought to you from
West Cornwall, UK
[Back to Top]
- G.R.S. MEAD
- From: "Daniel H Caldwell" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application