[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Truth or Untruth?

May 08, 1998 05:26 PM
by Daniel H Caldwell

K. Paul Johnson wrote:
> The question of how much of HPB's claims about her personal
> history, her Masters, the sources of her teachings, etc. are true
> and how much untrue is the central question facing anyone who
> tries to study her objectively.  Anyone who asserts at the outset
> that she always told the truth is simply ignoring the facts.
> Nothing wrong with that for those who choose that path, but then
> to make such a position the basis of harsh personal attacks on
> others is indeed wrong.
> Just one example of an obviously false statement will suffice to
> prove that she didn't *always* tell the truth.  Just one example
> of a demonstrably true claim suffices to prove that she didn't
> always lie.  Which leaves us in the position of having to decide
> when she told the truth and when not, and why.  Unless we opt out
> of that difficult question and try to create a climate where no
> one is allowed to bring it up without being attacked and
> ostracized.  Some religions like it that way; Theosophy was
> certainly not intended to foster such a climate.
> One example of deliberate untruth, from TMR:
> ...Krishnavarma is described by HPB in letters she wrote her Aunt
> Nadyezhda from New York in 1877.  She mentions a Krishnavarma who
> had come to New York from Multan in the Punjab by cart (?!) and
> was staying with the Founders.  He had praised Nadyezhda's last
> letter to HPB and forwarded it to Swami Dayananda.  HPB proceeds
> to tell of a trip "almost to California" that she and Olcott had
> taken with Krishnavarma:
> In Milwaukee and Nevada alll the ladies were all the time
> walking near our windows and the terrace where we were sitting to
> look at Krishnavarma; he is exceptionally beautiful although of
> the color of a light coffee.  In his long white pyjama dress and
> a white narrow turban on his head with diamonds on his neck and
> in bare feet he is really a curious sight among the Americans in
> black coats and white collars...When one sees him the first time
> he seems not more than 25, but there are moments he looks like a
> 100 years old man.(HPB Speaks, vol. 1, pp. 198-99)
> The facts: Swami Dayananda's disciple Krishavarma never visited
> the TS Founders in America, first meeting them in Bombay in 1879.
> They had corresponded prior to departure with him and other Arya
> Samaj members.  Olcott and HPB never went together to Milwaukee
> or to Nevada.  And all the details are invented.
> What does this tell us about HPB?

Daniel Caldwell replies:

As I pointed out the other day, Paul has now
given us (see above) an example of what he was referring
to.  Jerry S. has given another example:  the
three "bodies" as given in HPB's VOICE.

I do hope that Dallas (who challenged Paul
to quote chapter and verse) will directly respond
to what Paul has written.

Jerry HE has brought up one point but other than
that no other Blavatsky/theosophical student has
posted anything in reply to Paul.  Maybe I've missed

Here are two examples and here is a public
forum where this issue can be cleared up one way or the

[Back to Top]

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application