Theos-Talk Archives (March 1998 Message tt00278)

>Frank wrote:
>
>>Perhaps is anybody else able to enlighten
>>me why the St. Germain of the I AM Temple spreads teachings
>>which are not in harmony to the other masters. A riddle.
>
>How can the teachings of that personator(s) of the Rosicrucian Adept be in
>harmony with the other masters when they are not in harmony with
themselves,
>they always vary according to the many channellers whether it be Guy
>Ballard, Edna Ballard or Mark and Elizabeth Prophet.
>
>True chaneller must be able to raise his consciousness above the confusing
>astral plane to the higher mental and the striking quality of the message
>coming from a higher source is that of humility, a true Master will never
>make big claims, he will under-state rather than over-state and be very
>careful about what he says. The nature of these messages and the spiritual
>status of the chaneller are the available criteria to authenticate the
>source. It seems to me that all the chanellers of the I AM movement fail
>these criteria.
>
>Since people will believe in whatever they want to, it seems reasonable to
>follow the policy of what KH once wrote: "It may so happen that for
purposes
>of our own, mediums and their spooks will be left undisturbed and free not
>only to personate the 'Brothers' but even to forge our handwriting."
>
>Visanu
>

Dear Visanu,

Whenever the Ballards and the Prophets are mentioned by theosophists I will
read and listen with great care for I am myself a member of the TS and of
Saint Germain's Keepers of the Flame Fraternity, which in the outer world is
led by Elizabeth Clare Prophet.  I have not developed an apologetics for the
teachings coming from the Ballards and the Prophets which will deal with
most objections by theosophists. For me it sufficed that