Theos-Talk Archives (March 1998 Message tt00178)

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Brenda S. Tucker <brenda@theosophy.com>
Para: theos-talk@theosophy.com <theos-talk@theosophy.com>
Data: Sexta-feira, 20 de Março de 1998 20:12
Assunto: Re:Re: St. Germain's EARTH BIRTH CHANGES

>At 12:09 AM 3/20/98 +0100, you wrote:
>>This shows again the old saying that mediums have nothing new to
>>offer. But it raises two questions:
>>1. Is this "St. Germain" the same person that we know of as the Count
>>de St. Germain (Theos. Gloss. 308)?
>>2. Since when has theosophy anything to do with "channeling"?
>>Frank
>
>Frank,
>
>HPB was a medium. And when Dora Kunz teaches healing she uses channeling.
>
>St. Germain is behind the founding of a great movement this century called
>the I AM Temple.
>
>We are here to receive them. What's wrong with that?
>
>Brenda

    Blavatsky  may be medium like clear-sightedness ....but yours writtings
aren't "channeling". In "Letters from Masters of the Wisdom" , compiled by
C. Jinarajadasa that subject is clearly explained.
    I talk with Dora Kunz a few years ago... (she was a little girl when CWL
teaching to her and other six childrens...Dora, CWK and anothers 6 students,
all they are clear-sightedness...but she doesn't like to talk about this).
Your "channeling" in healing is only to receive and distribute positive
energies.
    I agree with Frank: Since when has theosophy anything to do with
"channeling"?
    Blavatsky is Blavatsky not by "channeling" , but by the Wisdom of yours
books.

Fernando de Freitas
>
>
>